LaserCollege

High-quality and respected aesthetic laser training

Uncategorized

A Simple Guide to Non-Invasive Body Sculpting Treatments

admin

Introduction

Body sculpting, or fat reduction, has become very popular as people look for ways to shape their bodies and get rid of unwanted fat. While liposuction is the most common method, it involves surgery, which can be painful and risky. Because of this, many people are turning to non-invasive (non-surgical) options. These methods don’t require surgery, but the results are sometimes less dramatic than liposuction.

This article will explain the most popular non-invasive treatments: radiofrequency (RF), ultrasound, lasers, and cryolipolysis (fat freezing), along with the results you can expect from each.

What is Body Sculpting?

Body sculpting helps reduce fat in specific areas, like the stomach, thighs, or arms. While liposuction removes fat through surgery, non-invasive methods break down fat in less risky ways. These non-surgical techniques target fat cells without cutting into the body.

The main methods are:

  1. Radiofrequency (RF): Uses heat from radio waves to damage fat cells.
  2. Ultrasound: Uses sound waves to break down fat.
  3. Lasers: Uses light to destroy fat cells.
  4. Cryolipolysis (Fat Freezing): Freezes the fat cells to break them down.

Each of these methods works differently, and the results may vary based on the treatment and the person. Let’s break down what each technology does and what results you can expect.

Radiofrequency (RF)

How it works:
Radiofrequency (RF) uses energy to create heat, which damages fat cells under the skin. Once damaged, these fat cells are removed naturally by the body over time.

Results:

  • RF can help reduce fat thickness by 2-3 millimeters (mm) in areas like the thighs or stomach【6】. This reduction may seem small, but it can make a visible difference, especially in areas with cellulite (the bumpy appearance of skin).
  • Some studies showed that people experienced a 55% improvement in cellulite after about 8 treatment sessions【10】.
  • The fat reduction and improved skin appearance last for a few months, but some fat returns after 6 months, so more treatments may be needed to maintain the results【6】.
  • Side effects include mild pain, redness, or swelling, but these usually go away after a short time【9】.

Ultrasound

How it works:
Ultrasound technology uses sound waves to break apart fat cells. There are two types of ultrasound:

  • Low-frequency ultrasound: Breaks fat cells but doesn’t heat the skin【11】.
  • High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU): Uses heat and sound waves together to destroy fat【11】.

Results:

  • Ultrasound treatments can reduce waist size significantly. One study found that waist size decreased by 6.86 centimeters after treatment【14】. Other areas, such as the thighs, arms, and buttocks, also saw reductions of several centimeters【14】.
  • In some cases, these results lasted for up to a year, but the effect might wear off after 6 months, meaning that follow-up treatments are sometimes necessary【13】.
  • While the treatment can cause some discomfort or redness, the side effects are usually minor【15】.

Lasers

How it works:
Laser treatments for fat reduction use low-level light to create small holes in fat cells, causing them to break down and be removed by the body【16】.

Results:

  • The results from laser treatments are mixed. In some studies, people saw a small reduction in size (around 2 centimeters), but the difference was not always noticeable【16】.
  • Some studies showed little to no difference between those who received laser treatment and those who didn’t, meaning more research is needed to determine how effective lasers really are【17】.
  • Lasers are still in the early stages of development for fat reduction, and the results are not as reliable as other treatments like cryolipolysis or ultrasound【18】【19】.

Cryolipolysis (Fat Freezing)

How it works:
Cryolipolysis, also known as fat freezing, cools fat cells until they break down. These damaged fat cells are then naturally removed by the body over time. This treatment is popular because it’s non-invasive and doesn’t require any recovery time【22】【23】.

Results:

  • Cryolipolysis tends to produce some of the best results among non-invasive treatments.
  • One study showed that 84% of people noticed a visible reduction in fat after just one treatment【23】.
  • After one treatment, fat thickness in the treated area was reduced by about 22%【23】. People who had two treatments saw even better results, with an additional 7% fat reduction after the second session【25】.
  • The most common side effects are temporary redness, bruising, or numbness, which usually go away within a few weeks【25】.

Overall Conclusion

Non-invasive body sculpting offers a safer, less painful way to reduce fat without surgery. However, the results are not as immediate or dramatic as liposuction. Depending on the treatment, you might need multiple sessions to see the best results, and the fat reduction might not be permanent unless you keep up with follow-up treatments.

Here’s a summary of the results from each treatment:

  1. Radiofrequency (RF): Modest reduction in fat thickness (2-3 mm) and improvement in cellulite, but results fade after a few months【6】【10】.
  2. Ultrasound: Significant reduction in waist size (up to 6.86 cm), but results may fade after 6 months【14】【13】.
  3. Lasers: Small reductions in body size (around 2 cm), but the results are inconsistent and need more research【16】【17】.
  4. Cryolipolysis: One of the most effective methods, with up to 22% fat reduction after one treatment and an additional 7% after a second treatment【23】【25】.

If you’re looking for a non-invasive way to reduce fat and shape your body, cryolipolysis seems to offer the best results, while radiofrequency and ultrasound can help as well, especially for improving the look of cellulite.

References

  1. 2011 Plastic Surgery Procedural Statistics. 2012; Available from: http://www.surgery.org/media/statistics.
  2. Mulholland RS, Paul MD, Chalfoun C. Noninvasive body contouring with radiofrequency, ultrasound, cryolipolysis, and low-level laser therapy. Clin Plast Surg. 2011;38(3):503–20.
  3. Zelickson BD et al. Histological and ultrastructural evaluation of the effects of a radiofrequency-based nonablative dermal remodeling device: a pilot study. Arch Dermatol. 2004;140(2):204–9.
  4. Alexiades-Armenakas M, et al. Prospective multicenter clinical trial of a minimally invasive temperature-controlled bipolar fractional radiofrequency system for rhytid and laxity treatment. Dermatol Surg. 2012.
  5. Hantash BM et al. Bipolar fractional radiofrequency treatment induces neoelastogenesis and neocollagenesis. Lasers Surg Med. 2009;41(1):1–9.
  6. Mlosek RK et al. The effectiveness of anticellulite treatment using tripolar radiofrequency monitored by classic and high-frequency ultrasound. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012;26(6):696–703.
  7. Ikomi F, Schmid-Schonbein GW. Lymph transport in the skin. Clin Dermatol. 1995;13(5):419–27.
  8. Monteux C, Lafontan M. Use of the microdialysis technique to assess lipolytic responsiveness of femoral adipose tissue after 12 sessions of mechanical massage technique. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2008;22(12):1465–70.
  9. Gold MH et al. Treatment of wrinkles and elastosis using vacuum-assisted bipolar radiofrequency heating of the dermis. Dermatol Surg. 2007;33(3):300–9.
  10. Belenky I et al. Exploring channeling optimized radiofrequency energy: a review of radiofrequency history and applications in esthetic fields. Adv Ther. 2012;29(3):249–66.
  11. Haar GT, Coussios C. High intensity focused ultrasound: physical principles and devices. Int J Hyperthermia. 2007;23(2):89–104.
  12. Jewell ML et al. Randomized sham-controlled trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a high-intensity focused ultrasound device for noninvasive body sculpting. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(1):253–62.
  13. Solish N et al. A randomized, single-blind, postmarketing study of multiple energy levels of high-intensity focused ultrasound for noninvasive body sculpting. Dermatol Surg. 2012;38(1):58–67.
  14. Ferraro GA et al. Synergistic effects of cryolipolysis and shock waves for noninvasive body contouring. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012;36(3):666–79.
  15. Alster TS, Tanzi EL. Noninvasive lifting of arm, thigh, and knee skin with transcutaneous intense focused ultrasound. Dermatol Surg. 2012;38(5):754–9.
  16. Caruso-Davis MK et al. Efficacy of low-level laser therapy for body contouring and spot fat reduction. Obes Surg. 2011;21(6):722–9.
  17. Elm CM et al. Efficacy of a multiple diode laser system for body contouring. Lasers Surg Med. 2011;43(2):114–21.
  18. Anderson RR et al. Selective photothermolysis of lipid-rich tissues: a free electron laser study. Lasers Surg Med. 2006;38(10):913–9.
  19. Wanner M et al. Effects of non-invasive, 1,210 nm laser exposure on adipose tissue: results of a human pilot study. Lasers Surg Med. 2009;41(6):401–7.
  20. Rotman H. Cold panniculitis in children. Adiponecrosis E frigore of Haxthausen. Arch Dermatol. 1966;94(6):720–1.
  21. Duncan WC, Freeman RG, Heaton CL. Cold panniculitis. Arch Dermatol. 1966;94(6):722–4.
  22. Manstein D et al. Selective cryolysis: a novel method of non-invasive fat removal. Lasers Surg Med. 2008;40(9):595–604.
  23. Dover J, Burns J, Coleman S, et al. A prospective clinical study of noninvasive cryolypolysis for subcutaneous fat layer reduction – interim report of available subject data. Lasers Surg Med. 2009;S21(45).
  24. Coleman SR et al. Clinical efficacy of noninvasive cryolipolysis and its effects on peripheral nerves. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2009;33(4):482–8.
  25. Shek SY, Chan NP, Chan HH. Non-invasive cryolipolysis for body contouring in Chinese – a first commercial experience. Lasers Surg Med. 2012;44(2):125–30.
Posts created 70

Related Posts

Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search. Press ESC to cancel.

Back To Top